Following my previous post
surrounding the psychology of horror, entitled ‘The Horrific Psychology’. (If
you haven’t read it yet – go now! What are you waiting for?) For years,
directors have tried to captivate their audience with an essence of enthusiasm
and an excess of emotional feed. Not many people have managed to achieve this.
There are very few who in fact have. Names that have marked themselves on the
map: Alfred Hitchcock, Stephen King, William Fredkin alongside a few others,
are all fathers to horror classics we all know and love. The Exorcist, The
Shining, and Psycho are considered by a majority of movie lovers, as well as
critics, to be a ‘must see movie’ title. Spending so much time with media and
movie analysis has helped me uncover the true elements of the making of a
Hollywood horror movie.
What do you think of when I
say conventions and connotations? Maybe this is the first time you’ve seen
these words together on a page of A4 and you find yourself screaming at me to
continue to form sentences and unravel movies behind the scene! It might seem
as if I was just throwing words at you, but not at all; stick with me on this
one!
Denotations, connotations,
and conventions are what make a movie. In horror, these seem to be a little
more apparent. I like to think of these three components; conventions,
denotations and connotations are what help the audience to identify the genre
of movie they’re watching. Excuse me for stating the obvious!
I’m here to suggest whether
this theory / methodology is still in existence today. Traditionally, when we
watch a horror movie, there are five factors we, as an audience look out for.
So, these are what you would in a conventional horror movie. As part of my research, I found myself going back; watching some of the classics these past couple of days has made me realize the contemporary pattern of horror movies still exists today. As well as the examples above, I’ve still yet to understand why brunette females are more superior to blondes? Who wrote the rules, and what’s the logic behind it? This is still apparent to the horror movies of this generation. When we look at titles such as Paranormal Activity, Saw, Nightmare on Elm Street, and its other predecessors, we see a divide. Girls are always at a disadvantage in the horror scene. If I were to be specific, I’d say blonde teens are the vulnerable ones, while the brunettes bring on the battle with the villains, ‘demonoids’ and secluded houses that never seem to have electricity!
- Red font (credits)
- Mise-en-scene (props) knives, masks etc.
- Iconography (blood, secluded locations, eerie music, vulnerable characteristics, so on and so fourth).
- Good vs evil
- Location / atmosphere / environment
So, these are what you would in a conventional horror movie. As part of my research, I found myself going back; watching some of the classics these past couple of days has made me realize the contemporary pattern of horror movies still exists today. As well as the examples above, I’ve still yet to understand why brunette females are more superior to blondes? Who wrote the rules, and what’s the logic behind it? This is still apparent to the horror movies of this generation. When we look at titles such as Paranormal Activity, Saw, Nightmare on Elm Street, and its other predecessors, we see a divide. Girls are always at a disadvantage in the horror scene. If I were to be specific, I’d say blonde teens are the vulnerable ones, while the brunettes bring on the battle with the villains, ‘demonoids’ and secluded houses that never seem to have electricity!
However, there are
sometimes cracks in the system, especially when we look at a movie based on
Stephen King’s novel – Carrie, a portrayal of a teenage girl who’s left as the
odd one out among her classmates. However, she still manages to make her
presence known with her powers of telekinesis. Here, we see a change of pattern
occurring as Carrie is portrayed as a blonde teen who starts out as a passive
character then emerges into an active and dominant presence.
Coming back to the houses,
have you noticed 9/10 they’re strategically placed on a road that leads to
nowhere – odd isn’t it? At least it works!
If you have a close
relationship with horror, then I’m sure you’ve noticed one fact that seems to
be a concrete element within its movies. If a female character in her teens is
in a relationship, and she loses her virginity, this stood for one thing. Maybe
this was Hollywood’s way of letting movie enthusiasts know sleeping with your
boyfriend without wedlock is a cardinal sin! Hence, the ultimate punishment is
death.
Anyway, let’s not make this
article any more somber than it needs to be. Instead, let’s talk about the
funniest / irritating truth in horror’s existence. Ladies and gentlemen, I’m
talking about the character’s reaction to utter panic and fear. If there’s one
thing that’s got me screaming “WTF are you doing” during a horror sequence,
it’s when characters run the opposite direction to safety.
Why climb through an open window,
when you really should be heading for the front door, and hiding into the inner
depths of darkness? Seems to be a little less time consuming, don’t you think?
Another thing, why run upstairs? Did you forget to even consider the time it
takes to use the stairs, let alone the likelihood of tripping on the staircase
when you have an axe murderer chasing after you? I guess this is why directors
like Wes Craven created movies like Scary Movie, so we can laugh at our own
expense!
No comments:
Post a Comment